Policy area

Current directionScope: Mixed criminal-law, health and devolved service responsibilitiesVersion 1.1Reviewed 26 July 2026
A specific review or investigation remains open within this policy area.

Drugs and addiction

Treat drug policy as a combined health, freedom, public-safety and criminal-market question.

Current direction

Treat drug policy as a combined health, freedom, public-safety and criminal-market question.

Honest Politics should support:

  • prevention and treatment for dependency;
  • action against organised supply, exploitation and violence;
  • harm reduction where it demonstrably saves life and supports recovery;
  • honest examination of criminal penalties, enforcement displacement and black-market adaptation;
  • monitoring of potency, mental-health effects and youth exposure;
  • careful international comparison.

Important qualification

Cannabis should remain illegal while Honest Politics completes a full review of the evidence and realistic alternatives.

The evidence, public opinion, rights, enforcement effects, health consequences and alternative regulatory models have not yet been examined through the full Decision Standard.

The present direction is therefore continued prohibition, combined with an open commitment to change that position if the full review shows that another model would better protect health, young people, freedom and public safety.

Main cost and strongest objection

Any legal model carries risks. Prohibition can sustain criminal markets and enforcement harms, while liberalisation or regulated access can increase availability, commercial incentives, youth exposure or health damage.

The strongest objection: that continued prohibition may sustain criminal markets, enforcement harms and inconsistent treatment without reducing use or health damage enough to justify those costs.

What could change this direction

The current prohibition position should change if a credible alternative performs better across health, freedom, youth protection, organised crime, enforcement, treatment and market design without creating greater overall harm.

Before this becomes a developed proposal

The policy must identify a precise problem, realistic options, evidence, rights, distribution, cost, delivery responsibility, territorial scope, evaluation and stopping conditions. A stronger public status cannot be created by wording alone.

Challenge this position

Relevant evidence, delivery experience, factual corrections and serious objections can be submitted through the evidence route.